clearpix.gif (43 bytes)
clearpix.gif (43 bytes)
Big Daddy Baseball League

www.bigdaddybaseball.com

O F F I C I A L   S I T E   O F   T H E   B I G   D A D D Y   B A S E B A L L   L E A G U E
slant.gif (102 bytes) From the Desk of the Commish

Commish

clearpix.gif (43 bytes)

March, 2006

2006 BDBL Farm Report

One of the most enjoyable aspects of running a BDBL franchise is "discovering" some pimply-faced teenager in the low minor leagues and watching him develop into a low-cost, high-impact player.  Developing a good farm system requires a wide depth of knowledge in the game of baseball, a lot of free time for research and-- more than anything else --a lot of luck.  The question is: How important is it to have a good farm system?

If a team ranks #1 in this survey, does that bode well for the team's future?  Conversely, if a team ranks dead-last, does that mean nothing but doom and gloom?  In order to answer that question, I collected all of the rankings from each of our BDBL farm reports over the past six years.  I then matched those rankings to the average number of wins each team recorded in year+1, year+2, etc., through year+5.  Here are the results:

Rank Year 0 Year+1 Year+2 Year+3 Year+4 Year+5 Average
1 77 82 97 89 89 108 90
2 92 94 96 92 92 73 90
3 71 86 74 79 71 73 76
4 82 94 91 90 91 76 87
5 75 82 83 71 92 86 81
6 88 75 83 80 70 67 77
7 87 76 97 91 107 64 87
8 87 82 79 83 82 76 82
9 79 90 84 90 87 88 86
10 82 83 79 91 76 81 82
11 86 76 78 80 69 89 80
12 81 87 83 70 95 102 86
13 77 80 88 81 74 91 82
14 75 69 65 89 66 91 76
15 86 76 72 76 94 71 79
16 59 66 47 42 75 80 61
17 78 81 77 67 83 66 75
18 87 89 100 106 86 102 95
19 81 81 71 72 79 87 79
20 83 79 72 80 88 58 77
21 83 86 72 72 71 52 73
22 77 65 68 79 73 70 72
23 75 71 91 79 56 78 75
24 76 71 78 70 61 91 75

Correl

-0.20 -0.51 -0.41 -0.33 -0.48 -0.15 -0.51

This graph shows a fairly strong correlation between Farm Report ranking and wins.  The #1 and #2 ranked teams have performed very well, averaging 90 wins over the next six seasons, while the bottom six teams averaged fewer than 80 wins.

If you prefer charts to graphs:

The one outlier, of course, is that teams ranked #18 in this study seem to do the best of anyone, averaging a mind-boggling 95 wins over the next six years.  This outlier is caused mostly by the 2000 Allentown Ridgebacks, who ranked #18 in that year's study, but went on to win 405 games from 2002-2005.  In '02, the Ridgebacks (then known as the "Boise Bastards") farm consisted of guys named Buddy Yen, Carlos Mendez, Carlos Paredes, Corey Thurman and Joseph Delgado.  No, I don't have the foggiest idea who those guys are, either.  But the following season, Tom DiStefano took over, and the Ridgebacks' farm ranking jumped to #4 overnight.

Okay, enough of the intro.  How does your team rank THIS year?  See the chart below.  This year's panel of experts includes John Sickels (whose rankings are double-counted thanks to his chickenshit method of ranking hitters and pitchers separately), Baseball America, Baseball Prospectus, Deric McKamey (Baseball HQ), Bryan Smith (Baseball Analysts) and RotoAmerica.  I've also added a new column, showing the average ranking per franchise.  For what it's worth, this average corresponds to franchise wins at a 44% rate.

  Total Pts 2006 Rank 2005 Rank 2004 Rank 2003 Rank 2002 Rank 2001 Rank 2000 Rank Avg Rank
LAU 3,626 1 2 6 19 2 3 7 5.7
MAN 2,649 2 3 7 8 12 16 22 10.0
BCJ 2,506 3 12 22 20 21 23 21 17.4
KAN 2,491 4 5 4 9 17 11 4 7.7
SCS 2,176 5 9 13 2 3 10 17 8.4
VIL