March, 2006
2006 BDBL
Farm Report
One
of the most enjoyable aspects of running a BDBL franchise is
"discovering" some pimply-faced teenager in the low minor leagues and
watching him develop into a low-cost, high-impact player. Developing a
good farm system requires a wide depth of knowledge in the game of
baseball, a lot of free time for research and-- more than anything
else --a lot of luck.
The question is: How important is it to have a good farm system?
If a team ranks #1 in this survey, does
that bode well for the team's future? Conversely, if a team ranks
dead-last, does that mean nothing but doom and gloom? In order to
answer that question, I collected all of the rankings from each of our BDBL farm reports
over the past six years. I then matched those rankings to the average number of wins each team
recorded in year+1, year+2, etc., through year+5. Here are the results:
|
Rank |
Year 0 |
Year+1 |
Year+2 |
Year+3 |
Year+4 |
Year+5 |
Average |
|
1 |
77 |
82 |
97 |
89 |
89 |
108 |
90 |
|
2 |
92 |
94 |
96 |
92 |
92 |
73 |
90 |
|
3 |
71 |
86 |
74 |
79 |
71 |
73 |
76 |
|
4 |
82 |
94 |
91 |
90 |
91 |
76 |
87 |
|
5 |
75 |
82 |
83 |
71 |
92 |
86 |
81 |
|
6 |
88 |
75 |
83 |
80 |
70 |
67 |
77 |
|
7 |
87 |
76 |
97 |
91 |
107 |
64 |
87 |
|
8 |
87 |
82 |
79 |
83 |
82 |
76 |
82 |
|
9 |
79 |
90 |
84 |
90 |
87 |
88 |
86 |
|
10 |
82 |
83 |
79 |
91 |
76 |
81 |
82 |
|
11 |
86 |
76 |
78 |
80 |
69 |
89 |
80 |
|
12 |
81 |
87 |
83 |
70 |
95 |
102 |
86 |
|
13 |
77 |
80 |
88 |
81 |
74 |
91 |
82 |
|
14 |
75 |
69 |
65 |
89 |
66 |
91 |
76 |
|
15 |
86 |
76 |
72 |
76 |
94 |
71 |
79 |
|
16 |
59 |
66 |
47 |
42 |
75 |
80 |
61 |
|
17 |
78 |
81 |
77 |
67 |
83 |
66 |
75 |
|
18 |
87 |
89 |
100 |
106 |
86 |
102 |
95 |
|
19 |
81 |
81 |
71 |
72 |
79 |
87 |
79 |
|
20 |
83 |
79 |
72 |
80 |
88 |
58 |
77 |
|
21 |
83 |
86 |
72 |
72 |
71 |
52 |
73 |
|
22 |
77 |
65 |
68 |
79 |
73 |
70 |
72 |
|
23 |
75 |
71 |
91 |
79 |
56 |
78 |
75 |
|
24 |
76 |
71 |
78 |
70 |
61 |
91 |
75 |
|
Correl |
-0.20 |
-0.51 |
-0.41 |
-0.33 |
-0.48 |
-0.15 |
-0.51 |
This graph shows a fairly strong
correlation between Farm Report ranking and wins. The #1
and #2 ranked teams have performed very well, averaging 90 wins over the
next six
seasons, while the bottom six teams averaged fewer than 80 wins.
If you prefer charts to graphs:

The one outlier, of course, is that
teams ranked #18 in this study seem to do the best of anyone, averaging a
mind-boggling 95 wins over the next six years. This outlier is
caused mostly by the 2000 Allentown Ridgebacks, who ranked #18 in that
year's study, but went on to win 405 games from 2002-2005. In '02, the Ridgebacks (then
known as the "Boise Bastards") farm consisted of
guys named Buddy Yen, Carlos Mendez, Carlos Paredes, Corey Thurman and
Joseph Delgado. No, I don't have the foggiest idea who those guys are,
either. But the following season, Tom DiStefano took over, and the
Ridgebacks' farm ranking
jumped to #4 overnight.
Okay, enough of the intro. How
does your team rank THIS year? See the chart below. This
year's panel of experts includes John Sickels (whose rankings are
double-counted thanks to his chickenshit method of ranking hitters and
pitchers separately), Baseball America, Baseball Prospectus, Deric
McKamey (Baseball HQ), Bryan Smith (Baseball Analysts) and RotoAmerica. I've
also added a new column, showing the average ranking per
franchise. For what it's worth, this average corresponds to
franchise wins at a 44% rate.
|
|
Total Pts |
2006 Rank |
2005 Rank |
2004 Rank |
2003 Rank |
2002 Rank |
2001 Rank |
2000 Rank |
Avg Rank |
|
LAU |
3,626 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
19 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
5.7 |
|
MAN |
2,649 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
8 |
12 |
16 |
22 |
10.0 |
|
BCJ |
2,506 |
3 |
12 |
22 |
20 |
21 |
23 |
21 |
17.4 |
|
KAN |
2,491 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
17 |
11 |
4 |
7.7 |
|
SCS |
2,176 |
5 |
9 |
13 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
17 |
8.4 |
|
VIL |
| |