January, 2021
2021
Draft Day Preview
2020 was a year unlike any other in
human history, filled with unprecedented actions that would have seemed
inconceivable a year ago. Like everything else in
2020, the BDBL was severely affected by the global pandemic known as
"COVID-19." As a result, for the first time in our league's history, we
will not be playing with actual MLB stats, but projected stats. This
will have a major effect on our 2021 season, and that effect extends to
Draft Day.
In addition to the major change in the
stats that we use to play this game, there were also some significant
changes made to our rulebook, which will have a tremendous impact on
this season and this auction/draft. Some of those rule changes were made
necessary by the pandemic. Others were passed via voting in September of 2019,
back when the world was relatively normal.
Perhaps the most significant rule
change we introduced this year was to erase all bonuses and penalties for
wins and losses. The total amount of spending money available this
winter is in the same ballpark as past years, but with one major
difference: the teams with the most amount of money to spend are
generally those who were toward the bottom of the standings a year ago.
Hopefully, this will help break the pattern of seeing the same teams in
the postseason year after year.
For only the third time in league
history, a team will have more than $50 million to spend this winter.
(More on that story below.) And, for the first time ever, Mike Trout
will be a free agent. (More on that story below, as well.)
The 2021 BDBL season is shaping up to
be a very interesting and competitive season already. Pandemic,
schmandemic. The BDBL rolls on like an unstoppable freight train.
How does this year's auction
class compare to others?
Well...we have no way of knowing the
answer to that question.
Comparing VORP, as we have in past years, would be pointless, given the fact that MLB played only
60 games in 2020. That said, there is a ton of offensive talent
available this winter, including arguably the greatest free agent
available in the auction since Barry Bonds. Not since Bonds has their
been a safer bet to produce MVP-caliber numbers year after year than
Mike Trout. Unlike Bonds, who became a free agent in his late-30's and
early-40's, Trout is still in the prime of his career at age 29.
In the winter of 2009, Jeff Paulson
paid a record $22 million for a 28-year-old C.C. Sabathia, who earned
every penny of that salary by winning 29 games and a Cy Young award that year, en
route to the Undertakers' first of many BDBL championships, and 20-plus
games over the next two years. Could Mike Trout fetch more than $22 million?
You betcha. In fact, I would say it's almost a certainty.
In this year of regressed/normalized stats, Trout
is the only player on the disk with an overall OPS of over 1.000, and
the only one with a 1.000+ OPS against left-handers. He leads all
hitters on the disk in OPS, OPS vs. LH, OPS vs. RH, runs created,
on-base percentage, slugging, and RC/27. He is one of only five hitters
with 40+ home runs, and one of only three hitters with a 1.000+ OPS
against right-handers.
Gosh, I wonder who will be bidding
heavily on Trout this winter! Could it be the guy who has a history of
putting all of his auction eggs in one basket, leaving a roster filled
with emptiness? Hmm...
In addition to Trout, those with
spending money can fight over the rights to Nolan Arenado
(.298/.367/.567 projection) for the first time in league history. Jose
Ramirez (.281/.361/.527), Nick Castellanos (.281/.335/.521), Charlie
Blackmon (.298/.355/.519), Anthony Rizzo (.284/.388/.510), Marcus Semien
(.274/.348/.486), and Eugenio Suarez (.262/.349/.515) are available as
well.
Those guys are the "A Team." The "B
Team" isn't too shabby, either: Trey Mancini (.273/.337/.495), Carlos
Santana (.253/.365/.455), Jorge Soler (.256/.351/.509), J.T. Realmuto
(.277/.333/.498), Mike Moustakas (.270/.332/.521), D.J. LeMahieu
(.293/.345/.440), Jose Abreu (.269/.322/.476), and Starling Marte
(.285/.332/.460) all created between 80 and 95 runs on the disk.
On the pitching side, the pickings are
slim. Yu Darvish (154+ IP, 3.56 ERA), Charlie Morton (159 IP,
3.34 ERA), Lance Lynn (173+ IP, 4.05 ERA), Zack Wheeler (177 IP, 4.02
ERA), and Robbie Ray (164+ IP, 4.00 ERA) represented the cream of a very
thin crop before Mike Stein graciously handed Justin Verlander (190+ IP,
3.22 ERA) his walking papers. Assuming our newly-formed auction committee
adds Verlander to the mix, he will become the #1 pitching target of the
auction, and is guaranteed to fetch Jacob deGrom-type money in this
severely-depressed pitching market, even despite his age and health
concerns.
Another pitcher released on Cutdown
Day who will surely be added to the top-50 is Felipe Vazquez (64 IP,
2.67 ERA). He becomes the best relief option available in the auction,
with very few others who even resemble a closer.
Given that Vazquez is scheduled to spend the bulk of the next few years
behind bars, and can be released without penalty at the end of this
season, it's a given that he will fetch well over $5 million in this
auction. The only question is how much money a team is willing
to spend for a one-year closer.
The next-closest resemblance to a
"closer" available this winter is Cowtippers castaway Taylor Rogers
(3.09 ERA in 67 IP.) In a year where no pitcher has dominant stats, the
whole idea of having a shutdown closer has gone out the window for the
time being. Every team in the league will face challenges in the late
innings as a result of our normalized projections.
What about the draft class?
Normally, it is a wise draft strategy to
grab bargains in the draft who were injured, or simply slumped, in the
previous MLB season, and hope for a comeback. This year, that strategy is
mostly impossible, as the auction committee has already factored this
into their equation, and our normalized projections washed out any actual
injuries and slumps that occurred during the 2020 MLB season.
What remains are the fliers and
roster-fillers that you would normally find after Round 25 of our draft.
Because it's baseball, some of those guys will actually have productive
MLB 2021 seasons (if they are allowed to play at all this year.)
Discovering those hidden gems will be either a total crapshoot or an
indication of general managerial genius.
How much money is out there this year?
I have often felt that the BDBL could
be used as a model for some young Economics major's thesis paper. It
really is fascinating to see how our little micro-economy works from
year-to-year. Our total currency in circulation hasn't changed since
1998, and yet due to the laws of supply-and-demand, we have seen some
drastic changes through the years in terms of how teams allocate their
spending money.
This year, after several years of
shifting the goalposts on bonuses and penalties for wins and losses, we
finally dumped the entire concept altogether. You would think that would
have had a major impact on the amount of spending money available this
winter, but it appears as though the bonuses and penalties simply
cancelled each other out. As a result, the total spending money
available this year is roughly in line with past years.
That said, take a look at the table
below. Notice that "cash per player" column for 2021? Teams will have an
average of over $2 million to spend per free agent for the first time in
our auction's history. There are a total of 840 roster spots (on the
35-man roster) in the BDBL. This year, 575 of those spots are already
filled, as the players from last year were given extensions to this
season. That leaves only 265 roster spots that need to be filled this
winter:
Year |
Total cash
available ($MM) |
# of free
agents needed |
Cash per
player ($MM) |
$ spent in
auction
($MM) |
2003 |
$557.1 |
360 |
$1.55 |
$328.5 (59%) |
2004 |
$606.2 |
343 |
$1.77 |
$363.5 (60%) |
2005 |
$498.2 |
292 |
$1.71 |
$318.0 (64%) |
2006 |
$621.3 |
327 |
$1.90 |
$341.5 (55%) |
2007 |
$569.0 |
296 |
$1.92 |
$364.5 (64%) |
2008 |
$595.5 |
320 |
$1.86 |
$324.0 (54%) |
2009 |
$543.3 |
292 |
$1.86 |
$289.5 (53%) |
2010 |
$417.5 |
261 |
$1.60 |
$289.5 (69%) |
2011 |
$472.9 |
295 |
$1.60 |
$269.0 (57%) |
2012 |
$361.0 |
267 |
$1.35 |
$214.5 (59%) |
2013 |
$511.8 |
293 |
$1.75 |
$272.0 (53%) |
2014 |
$489.0 |
297 |
$1.64 |
$296.5 (61%) |
2015 |
$352.5 |
275 |
$1.28 |
$201.0 (57%) |
2016 |
$540.9 |
291 |
$1.85 |
$278.5 (51%) |
2017 |
$589.7 |
306 |
$1.93 |
$294.0 (50%) |
2018 |
$505.9 |
295 |
$1.71 |
$253.0 (50%) |
2019 |
$523.6 |
284 |
$1.84 |
$274.0 (52%) |
2020 |
$573.2 |
316 |
$1.81 |
$295.5 (52%) |
2021 |
$542.7 |
265 |
$2.05 |
TBD |
In 2012, we needed to fill roughly the
same number of spots (267), but we had a whopping $181.7 million less to
spend! In 2010, there were only 261 spots to fill (a record-low), but
there was $125.2 million less to spend. What we're looking at this
winter is a tremendous amount of money to be spent on a very small
number of players. Big demand, plus low supply, equals massive
inflation!
There is one other wrinkle to this
auction that is unprecedented in league history, and which could have
significant ramifications on pricing. Until this year, the top 50 free
agents were objectively chosen by their VORP totals over the previous
three MLB seasons. This year, those fifty were chosen subjectively by a
committee. In past years, we saw many deserving free agents miss the
top-50 for various reasons. That will not be the case in 2021. This
year's auction class should be filled with the most-deserving top-50
free agents ever. Which means that column to the far-right could break
2010's record of 69% of all money spent in the auction. Buckle-up!
Which teams will be spending all this money?
Here is where it gets very interesting.
We could very well see a situation unfolding where a team is able to buy
its way into the postseason. This has happened before, as recently as
last season, when Matt Clemm used his significant funding to purchase
Aroldis Chapman, Hyun-Jin Ryu, J.D. Martinez, Wilson Ramos, and Paul
Goldschmidt in the auction. Those players carried Bear Country into the
postseason (although, granted, just barely, as it required a one-game
playoff to get there through the wildcard.)
This winter, we have a team that has
enough money to do the same. However, that team -- the newly-named South
Philly Gritty -- not only has the money, but has a foundation of talent
significant enough to carry them further into the postseason than the
Jamboree last season. Like the kid born with a silver spoon in his
mouth, J.D. Luhning begins his BDBL career with a roster that already
includes Carlos Correa, Lourdes Gurriel, Austin Meadows, and Roberto
Osuna. He then has a whopping $51 million to fill in the rest of the
roster.
Two years ago, the Darien Blue Wave set
a new BDBL auction-era record with $52.3 million in spending cash. Only
one other team -- the 2010 Chicago Black Sox -- ever had more than $50
million to spend (although the 2019 Iron Spider Pigs came close, at
$49.8 million.) Of course, none of those three teams finished their
season with a record above .500, but they also didn't have the
foundation that South Philly has.
The other big spenders this winter will
be the Lake Norman Monsters ($47.7 million), Joplin Miners ($38.9),
Buckingham Sovereigns ($37), Darien Blue Wave ($34.8), and Las Vegas
Flamingos ($30.2). What do five of the six top spending teams all have
in common? They all finished the 2020 BDBL season below .500.
At the opposite end of the spending
spectrum, the Ravenswood Infidels ($2.7 million), Salem Cowtippers
($4.6), Bear Country Jamboree ($11), Great Lakes Sphinx ($11.1), and Los
Altos Undertakers ($12.5) will mostly sit on the sidelines throughout
the auction. What do those five teams have in common? They all finished
above .500 in 2020!
How does the Class of 2022
look at this point?
The 2022 auction is shaping up to be a
tremendous pitcher's market. This draft class is filled with aces:
Gerrit Cole, Stephen Strasburg, Sonny Gray, Patrick Corbin, Zack Greinke,
Clayton Kershaw, Roberto Osuna, Chris Sale, and Madison Bumgarner.
The offensive side looks a little light
at this point, with Anthony Rendon heading the class, followed by a
mixture of younger players still in their primes and fading superstars
well past theirs: Ketel Marte, Tommy Pham, Trevor Story, Justin Turner,
Eddie Rosario, Matt Carpenter, Tim Anderson, Michael Conforto, and Joey
Votto. |